This quote expresses relief or astonishment at the fact that a nuclear war has not yet occurred. It implies that the absence of a nuclear conflict is a fortunate circumstance, considering the catastrophic consequences that such a war would entail.
This quote emphasizes the destructive nature of war and the need to find peaceful resolutions to conflicts in order to prevent the downfall of humanity.
This quote implies that in the chaos and brutality of war, it is often innocent and virtuous individuals who suffer the most, while wicked or immoral individuals may exploit the situation to their advantage. It reflects the unjust and unpredictable nature of war and its disproportionate impact on the innocent.
This quote expresses a strong desire for the eradication of war, considering it a destructive and detrimental affliction upon humanity. It implies that the ultimate goal should be the elimination of war and the establishment of lasting peace on a global scale.
This quote suggests that a conflict between European nations can be seen as a civil war due to shared cultural, historical, and geopolitical ties. It implies that despite national boundaries, there is a sense of commonality and interconnectedness among European countries.
This quote straightforwardly expresses the speaker's intense dislike and aversion towards war. It conveys a strong sentiment of abhorrence and emphasizes the speaker's firm stance against engaging in armed conflicts.
This quote expresses a personal aversion to war based on the speaker's firsthand experiences. It implies that the individual has witnessed the horrors and consequences of war and, as a result, desires to avoid any further exposure to such violence and destruction.
This quote conveys the notion that in the context of war, the ultimate achievement or source of honor lies in simply surviving the ordeal. It implies that amidst the chaos and brutality of war, the ability to persevere and stay alive is a significant accomplishment.
This quote highlights the tendency of people to engage in discussions or conversations about war. It suggests that war, despite its tragic nature, often generates significant interest or attention from individuals who are intrigued by or fascinated with its complexities.